In today’s market landscape, ethical, political and environmental considerations increasingly sway consumer purchasing decisions, particularly when it comes to packaging.
Studies indicate that consumers are willing to put their money where their mouth is, with products that make environmental, social and governance-related claims seeing disproportionate growth over products that don’t make such claims, achieving a 1.7 percentage point increase in the CAGR.
Nevertheless, brands often fall short of meeting consumer expectations through various avenues, with a recent survey finding a staggering 88% of Gen Z respondents claiming they don’t trust brands’ green claims.
To mark World Consumer Rights Day, I explore how packaging serves as a powerful tool for companies to tackle particular consumer apprehensions, and strategies to assist businesses in actively engaging, educating and comforting consumers regarding their ethical commitments.
Deceptive Labeling
Deceptive labeling remains a persistent issue within the realm of packaging. Across various industries, misleading claims about a product’s attributes or benefits can create unrealistic expectations among consumers regarding its performance or quality. From exaggerated health claims to misleading descriptions of ingredients, deceptive labeling erodes consumer trust and undermines brand credibility.
Addressing this challenge requires a commitment to transparency and accuracy in packaging content and messaging.
Environmental Sustainability
Moreover, as consumer consciousness around environmental sustainability continues to rise, so too does the demand for eco-friendly packaging solutions.
However, while many consumers express a preference for products with minimal or eco-friendly packaging materials, the limited availability and higher costs of such options can pose significant barriers to adoption.
As such, companies face the dual challenge of meeting consumer demand for sustainable packaging while balancing economic considerations and operational constraints.
Brands are under increasing pressure to minimize the environmental footprint of their packaging materials and processes, from reducing waste and emissions to promoting recycling and circularity.
Innovative design techniques, lightweight materials and source reduction strategies offer avenues for reducing the use of virgin materials and minimizing environmental impact. By promoting the use of recycled content, biodegradable alternatives and renewable resources, brands can further advance their sustainability objectives and contribute to a more circular economy.
Embracing Inclusivity and Sensitivity
In addition to environmental considerations, packaging choices also can have profound social implications. Brands must be cognizant of the cultural sensitivities and diverse perspectives of their target audiences, particularly when incorporating imagery or messaging into packaging designs.
Failure to do so could be detrimental to a brand’s reputation. One example of this is Uncle Ben’s, which was accused of promoting racial stereotypes with the depiction of an African-American man on its packaging, prompting parent company Mars to rebrand the rice company to Ben’s Original in 2020.
By prioritizing inclusivity and cultural sensitivity in packaging design, brands can foster connections with diverse consumer groups and mitigate the risk of reputational damage.
Socio-Economic Disparities
The social impact of packaging extends beyond cultural considerations to encompass issues of equity and accessibility. Products with excessive or non-recyclable packaging may inadvertently exacerbate socio-economic disparities by imposing higher costs on lower-income consumers.
To address this challenge, companies must evaluate the financial implications of sustainable packaging options and seek cost-effective solutions that align with their sustainability goals.
Moreover, ensuring fair wages, safe working conditions and equitable opportunities within the packaging supply chain is essential to upholding social responsibility and promoting ethical business practices.
Collaboration and Accountability
Investing in improved recycling infrastructure and consumer education on proper recycling practices is critical to closing the loop on packaging waste and promoting a culture of environmental stewardship. By engaging with stakeholders across the packaging value chain, companies can foster collaboration, knowledge-sharing and collective action to address shared environmental challenges and drive positive change.
Measuring and reporting on Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) performance serves as a cornerstone of sustainable packaging practices. Brands that establish meaningful KPIs and track progress with performance metrics can better demonstrate accountability and transparency.
Leveraging established sustainability reporting frameworks, such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), enables companies to align their reporting practices with industry standards and best practices, facilitating comparability and credibility of information.
For over a decade, Charles Haverfield has led US Packaging & Wrapping from a customer-driven approach, ensuring employees and management understand how to identify needs before and after a purchase. With a wealth of experience in the industry, he consistently delivers high-quality packaging implementation to align with clients’ goals and market demands, which effectively increase efficiencies while lowering costs. US Packaging & Wrapping is dedicated to providing superior products and services at an affordable price. Its staff takes pride in the ability to inform customers about various packaging options. Headquartered in Central Arkansas with shipping warehouses on the East and West Coast, US Packaging & Wrapping strives for fast and affordable shipping.
View Original Article
